Penalty clause, or politicians in the penalty box?
We’re supposed to be citizen journalists. Does that mean we can make a difference? I’d argue it most certainly should!
The query to the left is a letter which the Scotsman graciously published when I put it to them. Alas, not a single politician responded. But, things need not end there.
Edinburgh is coming up for a local election, councillors face defending their seats, and – those brave enough – will be appearing at local hustings. Can they answer the question in front of a large public audience of potential voters? I’ve every intention of finding out, and our local “stirrer”, as the Broughton Spurtle bills themselves, are keen to join in with the challenge.
I spoke to one of their reporters earlier today, and will be joining them on the front bench to make life uncomfortable for candidates. The lesson everyone involved with Wikinews should learn? A simple one: Taking an active interest in political matters, and putting challenging questions to political candidates does not make you non-neutral. Just because nobody else has come up with the question does not make it non-neutral. You’re not softballing politicos of a certain persuasion, you’re asking them something that someone else should have come up with, but didn’t.
They work for us, remember? Make their life difficult, and make them think, and think hard, about what being a representative means. If they can’t answer this simple question, would you trust them with your granny’s bus pass, or your neighbour’s leaky roof?
I wouldn’t, and my vote will be based on who can actually give, and hold to, a sensible answer to this question.
If the question hurts, then I want to know who funded them standing for office – was it, perchance, the people who took Edinburgh for fools and promised a tram system at an undeliverable cost?
The curmudgeonly site administrator.
Actually (in real life) a systems analyst with a couple of decades experience. 'Fell' into journalism by accident, but find the critical thinking to design, or fix, large complex IT systems is readily-applicable to the craft of journalism. Well, it is once you unlearn many of the very passive phrasings more appropriate in specifying a piece of software.
In early December 2011, I had the pleasure of meeting Brian McNeil at GLAM Camp, Amsterdam where I was representing the History of Paralympics in Australia GLAM project. At the time, we were busy working on finalising the details for Wikimedians to the Games (W2G), an opportunity for two Wikimedians to attend the London Paralympics with behind the scenes access to the Games in order to cover them for Wikipedia and Wikinews courtesy of a press pass. This project was to be funded by the Australian Paralympic Committee and Wikimedia Australia, with the credentials being provided by one of these two organisations. To my knowledge, it was the first time a GLAM project had heavily involved Wikinews in a collaboration incentive programme. Certain types of GLAMs lend themselves better to Wikinews, Wikisource and Wiktionary than Wikipedia, and this was just such a case. No one else has really done this. Thus, terribly exciting for me and others inside Wikimedia Australia and the Australian Paralympic Committee.
We built into the W2G a requirement that participants write an article for Wikinews. In the process of meeting Brian at GLAM Camp and further conversations, I was even more excited. Reporter accreditation is seriously cool in terms of providing additional incentive to participate, especially for photographers. News stories go to Google News when published. You can cover topics in ways different and more meaningfully than you can on Wikipedia. The writing process as described is rather accessible for those who aren’t used to or don’t like Wikipedia’s formalistic, citation heavy editing style. It has useful help pages that don’t require digging 20 subpages into to find out how to edit within policy. The admins are accessible to request editing assistance from. This makes Wikinews accessible to a greater audience. I’m sold. I love using Wikinews for W2G and plan to encourage members of Wikimedia Australia to contribute. I plan to leverage Wikinews when I work with Australian sporting organisations to get them involved with WMF projects, because Wikinews is very useful tool.
Have I mentioned I loved Wikinews with out having published a story on Wikinews? About two and a half weeks ago, I decided to change this. I had permission to bring a photographer to test matches between Australia’s women’s national water polo team and Great Britain’s team. I bought a very nice camera after the second of five matches. I had notes I’d taken during these matches that included the score, attempts to identify player numbers by what other match attendees had told me, had several conversations with people attending the matches about what was going on. I could not record who scored how many goals and this information was not on a scoreboard.
After the fourth of five matches, I started drafting the article. I finished writing after the fifth and final test match. Writing for Wikinews felt as easy as I thought it would be. There were a few bumps along the way because I didn’t clearly read the instructions: Titles should be short, neutral and in active voice. Ooops. I moved changed the title after I created, and it was changed twice again to make sure it conformed with policy. The lead sentence is very important. It should be, according to the guidelines, interesting and answer the who, what, where, when, why and how questions. This was difficult for me. I required and received help from two other editors to get the lede into shape. The article needed to be three to four paragraphs long. I focused the first paragraph on answering the W questions. I used the last paragraph to provide box score information for all five matches. The second paragraph was a problem. I did not know what to say. I asked for help on the article talk page, on a user talk page and in the IRC channel. People told me I could write about how well the team performed. The second paragraph included these details. With the help of the regular writers, the lede paragraph became two paragraphs. The article finished with four paragraphs. I double checked the text to make sure it matched with policy: The text was written in active voice. Dates were expressed as yesterday, Sunday, last Tuesday instead of 21 February 2012. I created links to Wikinews and Wikipedia pages for relevant topics on the article.
Laura Hale's first Wikinews article, on the site's main page
In preparing the article, I did original reporting. I read the policy page, asked for more help on the talk page and followed the directions. I tagged the article with original reporting. I wrote reporter notes on the collaboration page. No scanning of hand written notes was required. I wrote down notes from my iPhone, paper and pictures I took. I wrote these notes in about 10 minutes.
In preparing the article, I also relied on other sources. On Wikipedia, you source every fact after you write the fact. On Wikinews, you source facts at the end of the article and fewer are required. Individual scoring information came from sources I used. This was cited at the bottom of the article.
On English Wikipedia, you include an image with out citing who took the picture. As I went through the final checklist, I discovered I need to attribute the photographer in the image caption. I did that. Everything on the checklist looked good. I clicked the submit for review button. I went to bed. I woke up and found the submission had been approved. The article appeared on the main page.
Writing for Wikinews is easy. Follow the guidelines. Request help if you are not sure. If you do this, you should be able to get your news article published. Here’s my article, slap-bang on the main page; try getting that sort of exposure on Wikipedia!
One of the goals in creating Wikinews was providing a syndication source. If you still have a local newspaper, ask them how painfully expensive reproducing articles from The New York TimesorTribune Media Services is; similarly, the main wire services Reuters, Associated Press, the Press Association and Agence France-Presse make dents in any publisher’s pocket-book.
Wikinews: The free news source you can copy
If you care about news and, even casually, follow developments in news production, you will know many larger city papers find themselves forced to close foreign bureaux. If your nearest big city paper no longer has a correspondent in Paris, and another in Auckland, how can they provide you with quality international news?
They can’t. Well, they can’t — unless they pay a syndication source or wire service.
Once you understand this dynamic of news, you can start to see that the apparent explosion of news availability brought by the Internet is, largely, “smoke and mirrors“. Only the really, really big players will have a correspondent in Moscow; your coverage originates with them, right across the dozen or so news sources you might consult.
Wikinews, amongst other things, seeks to address this shift of power.
Youcould be the ‘correspondent in Auckland‘, or Paris, Moscow, London, Edinburgh, even Seoul, Tokyo, or Santiago. The learning-curve for new contributors is quite steep, but thankfully short. Getting some of our established contributors to go over the issues they met is something for another post. It’s about seven or eight years since I started contributing, so my memory is a little hazy; not to mention, Wikinews was a lot wilder, lacked the all-important formal review, and wasn’t listed in Google News.
But, what about the other side? If Wikinewsies are trying to fill a few of the gaps left by long-gone foreign bureaux, to offer high-quality alternate coverage with a focus on neutrality and integrity, is anyone actually using it?
In recently getting Google News to correct how their spider scans Wikinews, this starts to become more-apparent. I found a few examples in the week or-so since the listing update. As should please a couple of contributors, this includes a “real” newspaper; their writing was syndicated — albeit not for print use.
Moreover, they credit Wikinews clearly and right at the top of the published copy. Although they did mis-capitalise Wikinews, it was important to reach out to them and let them know we’re happy to see our work going to a wider audience. My opinion is it was a smart move to exploit our lack of a “no derivatives” clause in the license we use for publication; they could, with little work on their part, provide a quality report for their readers.
Romney, as covered in some Wikinews reporting, isn’t finding the public universally accepting and adoring him. This is where we find another reuse, or at least citation, of our coverage.
Over on Examiner.com, they’re ‘Spreading Romney‘. Accompanied with an amusing dog photo, and highlighting the 25-thousand strong Facebook group “Dogs against Romney“, they draw from our Valentine’s Day report Santorum neologism spreads to Romney. For those who’ve not seen this fun side of USian electioneering, Romney is in the dog-house over his record on animal rights. The story is, in 1983 Romney and family were making a 12-hour drive from Boston to Ontario; lacking space for the family’s Red Setter inside the car, Romney strapped Seamus’ crate to the car roof.
The neologism? Poor Seamus crapped all over the car windscreen during the marathon drive. Romney, apparently, simply stopped at a gas station and hosed both car and dog down. So, the verb form of Romney is being defined as: To defecate in terror.
It would be interesting to know how many people subscribe to The Nelson Daily. Assuming they carry local coverage, announcements and so on, a double-digit percentage of the local population may look at it on a semi-regular basis. And, if you search their site, you discover they’ve been quietly reusing Wikinews content since at least May 2010. Excellent! Just what we’d hope to start finding more sources doing.
Perhaps a few might even start contributing; you could, if you care about news.
The curmudgeonly site administrator.
Actually (in real life) a systems analyst with a couple of decades experience. 'Fell' into journalism by accident, but find the critical thinking to design, or fix, large complex IT systems is readily-applicable to the craft of journalism. Well, it is once you unlearn many of the very passive phrasings more appropriate in specifying a piece of software.
Well, I just created another, shown here. I think this is slightly better put-together than the previous video report, but still has a few shortcomings.
The process of creating video reports such as this has one major drawback; it is very, very time-consuming. For this report, of just over fifteen minutes, I think I spent over 5 hours working on it.
I know, with practice, that time is going to come down; but, not as much as one might think. Anyone attempting a task like this is still going to need to watch the video clips they’re working from; video needs standardised to one resolution, and one aspect ratio. Titles need created, and then the entire project needs rendered.
All this, to-date, is without the added complexity of including any narration.
Before I attempt that particular task, I’ve decided I need to ‘convert’ a walk-in wardrobe into a small, and – yes – cramped, sound booth. It simply would not do to have a refrigerator buzzing in the background, traffic noises from the street. Or, considering where I live, some of the more choice ‘banter‘ from the street getting picked up (For the insatiably curious, there are still Trainspotters in Leith).
However, I should show-off some of these tools a little. That might encourage a few others to try their hand at video-editing. Linux isn’t all ‘transmission line-noise’ like sed, awk, grep, modprobe, touch and fsck; despite what you may have heard, it is perfectly usable by mere mortals.
Moving right along, You’re probably interested to see the two “most graphical” of the tools used to create this video. Those are GiMP and OpenShot.
Screenshot of GiMP running on Ubuntu 10.04-3 LTS
If you’ve not seen, or heard of, GiMP then, the simplest explanation is that it’s a Free replacement for Photoshop.
If you are a Photoshop user, you’ll need to un-learn certain ways of doing things. But, by-and-large, GiMP is a completely free functional replacement.Yes, the screenshot show here is huge (click to zoom-in); but as you’ll notice, GiMP is a multi-window application. You can work on a lot of images at any one time, build new images layer by layer, and a lot of effects are at your disposal.
What’s shown is version 2.6.8 of GiMP running on-top of Ubuntu version 10.04-3 LTS (Lucid Lynx).
It would seem, from checking the GiMP website, that I’ve got close to the latest-and-greatest version of the program. Whether or not there is a slightly later point release (i.e. I have 2.6.8 which is the .8 release of version 2.6) is not readily checked. Even better news for Windows and Mac OS users. There are downloadable version of GiMP you can use; meaning you can get rid of the three-versions-back pirate copy of Photoshop you got via torrent.
Would that I could say the same for OpenShot. Sadly, their website confirms the latest version is 1.4, and I’m only running version 1.1.3; nor is there a Windows or Mac OS version of the package.
OpenShot - 1.1.3 Running on Ubuntu 10.04-3 LTS
In theory, it’s possible to compile OpenShot for the Mac or Windows platforms, but that’s beyond me, and I’ve no need. Having discovered there is a more-current version, the instructions for upgrading to it, and staying current, are relatively straightforward.
Hopefully, with an upgrade, I will see less crashes from OpenShot. The improved layout shown in the video on the program’s website looks impressive.
I will be checking if the limitations I’ve experienced so far with OpenShot are removed. The most annoying of these I’ve met so-far is the 9999 seconds length limit on any clip you work with (2 hours 46 minutes and 39 seconds).
The other irksome limitation is how long you can run a “still” for; a “still” being a static .jpg or .png image which you stretch out. The perfect example of this would be the top-right Wikinews logo with which I branded the above video. Since the longest you can run a “still” in this version is 300 seconds, (five minutes) I had to repeat it three times across the video editing. If you take a closer look at the screenshot, you’ll see the branding is on track 3 and starts about 8 seconds into the video.
Since this screenshot is right at the start of the video, you can see how I’ve constructed the title sequence.
Openshot numbers tracks from bottom to top, so I put the music clip in on Track 1. On track 2 I’ve placed a white still for background, and track 3 fades in and out the full-screen Wikinews logo before switching to running the top-left ‘branding’ version of the logo.
Track 4 isn’t used much beyond what you see here; fade in/out the two “stills” with title information on them. This is one point where I know I need to improve my editing; the two “stills” share a common heading, and that should not fade out and back in again. However, having seen the advances between this version (1.1.3) of OpenShot and the latest (1.4), I expect there are significantly different options for achieving those results.
Beyond the credits, I simply cross-fade from one clip to another, or to a different point within any clip. Closing credits are, unsurprisingly, a slightly more simple reverse of the opening credits.
With that said, I’m off to remove OpenShot and Blender from my system, add the library for the latest version of OpenShot to my selected software repositories and, install the lot from scratch.
I would be curious to know what free software exists for Windows and/or Mac OS that provides the same functionality.
The curmudgeonly site administrator.
Actually (in real life) a systems analyst with a couple of decades experience. 'Fell' into journalism by accident, but find the critical thinking to design, or fix, large complex IT systems is readily-applicable to the craft of journalism. Well, it is once you unlearn many of the very passive phrasings more appropriate in specifying a piece of software.